© Karl-Erik Sveiby Aug 1998, updated Sept 2003. All rights reserved.
Here is a Four-step method that I have found quite useful for measuring Intangible Revenues.
The customers comprising 80% of sales should suffice. Many customers will receive several ü s.
Use the work sheet below to categorize your customers.
Intangible Revenues |
TOTAL | RANK | |||||
| Customer | Sales Volume |
Contributes to Financial Capital |
Contributes to External Structure |
Contributes to Internal Structure |
Contributes to Individual Competence |
||
| - Has own growth higher than the average customer - Comes with high profit projects (> 1st quartile) |
- Gives references - Gives active referrals - Is willing to act as references - Is in one of our priority specialty sectors |
- Comes with BIG projects - Requires new solutions that can be leveraged to other customers |
- Our employees and younger professionals learn from it - Our Senior executives learn from it |
||||
| A | $100000 | $100000 | $100000 | 3 | |||
| B | $90000 | $90000 | $90000 | 4 | |||
| C | $70000 | $70000 | $70000 | $140000 | 1 | ||
| D | $60000 | $60000 | 5 | ||||
| E | $50000 | $50000 | $50000 | $100000 | 3 | ||
| F | $30000 | $30000 | $30000 | $30000 | $30000 | $120000 | 2 |
| Others | $100000 | ||||||
| Total sales | $500000 | ||||||
| Total in columns | 550000 | $180000 | $120000 | $150000 | $100000 | ||
| Share | 33% | 22% | 27% | 18% | 100% | ||
The total in the columns will probably be larger than 100%, which is intentional.
Use the worksheet to analyse your customers. Look for:
What we are trying to get a grasp of is your company's exposure to a select group of your best customers. In the example above your exposure to customers that add to External Structure is for instance 22%.
The example indicates that your customers are very profitable, which is a good start. The Customers with learning projects seem too few, however. The External Structure would need a boost with new sales in that category. Customer F is a Gold Customer; very valuable, although it is small, because it is both very profitable in financial terms and contributes a lot to the intangible revenues. Trying to increase the sales to Customer F should be made a priority. Customer A is valuable because of its high profitability and its size, but is the company's profit perhaps too dependent on it? Can we generate intangible revenues from Customer A? That would be a huge benefit, because of its share of our business. We must must ask ourselves why we keep Customer D, which is fairly big, but contributes no Intangible Revenues at all and is not even particularly profitable.
Now consider the ranking. In a normal sales/customer analysis, the customer are ranked according to sales volume only - or at best - according to profitability. When you take the intangibles into consideration, the ranking may change considerably. In the example, Customer F, ranked 5 in a traditional analysis speeds up to rank 2. And Customer D fall down to rank 5. Etc.,
Next, you use the ranking in the analysis above to identify the opportunities for generating more revenues in your existing customer base. Remember that revenues are both intangible and tangible! Questions to ask:
| Customer / Product (or Service) | Total $sales | Product 1 | Service 2 | Service 3 |
| 1. Customer C | $140000 | $140000 | ||
| 2. Customer F | $30000 | $30000 | ||
| 3. Customer A | $100000 | $100000 | ||
| 4. Customer B | $90000 | $30000 | $30000 | $30000 |
| 5. Customer D | $60000 | $60000 |
Every empty space in the table is an opportunity for cross-selling!
Customer C is our best customer, but is buying only Product 1. How can we get Customer C to buy more? Can we use an endorsement from golden Customer F, which is buying Service 2? Same thing with Customer A and Customer D, who might be persuaded by an endorsement from Customer F. Why do we get so little intangible revenues from Customer D? Is there a reason? Why is Customer F buying so little from us? Is because it is small company or are there other reasons, competitors perhaps? Customer B is buying our whole range so we should use its referrals to generate more $-revenues.
Karl-Erik Sveiby
September 2003